‹ ALL SURFACES RECEIPT — the derivation chain · WHY, follow any step · two voices, one shape
✗
She can’t know this yet rule: world.impossible-knowledge “Elspeth references the altered will in Ch.7 sc.2 — she has no way to know it.”
Severity: PROBLEM under Drafting · would STOP THE EDIT under Lock
WHY — follow any step
1. Ch.7 sc.2, her line: “…since the will was changed.”[open line] sets believes(will-altered) via PERCEIVED — event e-2141 @ tick 3 977 2. The alteration: event e-1877 @ tick 3 960, Grayfriars study — but at tick 3 977 she is at Dover cottage. No co-presence.[open event] 3. And no other way in: her perceptual history to tick 3 977 holds no told / overheard / inferred / shown route for it.[open her view] ⇒ first-hand knowledge without presence, and no route in.
Fix ideas ▾ Undo the edit that caused this Keep it anyway…
?
Did we read this right? F from your manuscript One of these readings — or the story — has Marlow in two places at once.
ch.3 ¶14 reads as: boards the Nellie at dusk (conf 58%) · ch.1 ¶2 reads as: ashore on the quay (conf 91%)
WHY — follow any step
1. e-0312 move(Marlow → the Nellie) @ tick 214 · ingested ch.3 ¶14[open event] 2. e-0057 move(Marlow → the quay) @ tick 214 · ingested ch.1 ¶2[open event] ⇒ same-instant conflict; one cited reading sits below the confidence bar, so this asks — it does not rule.
Ch.3 is right — confirm it We misread it — fix the reading Show me both passages side by side
left: the declarative verdict voice — fix-idea proposal branches, undo, “keep it anyway” with a required why · right: the same shape in the question voice (below the confidence bar it asks, it does not rule) · in 01 LEADER , receipts open live from the strip and their citations drive the playhead